Industrial Systems

Within world industry, about 49% of onsite energy is lost to waste and inefficiency 1. Systemic changes in the structure of manufacturing plants can reduce these losses.

The image: "industrial_systems.svg" cannot be found!

Sources: the Building Energy Codes Program 2, Elson et al. 3, Global Energy Assessment 1, Hedmon et al. 4, IEA 5 and 6, the Department of Energy 7, UN Environment 8, UNIDO 9.

Benchmarking

Benchmarking is the practice of measuring the energy performance of plants across an industry and setting the best performing plants as a standard. As of 2010, there is an estimated potential of 23-31 exajoules of energy savings through benchmarking, mostly in low-income countries 9. The International Energy Agency estimates that applying benchmarks to the G20 countries can save nearly half the energy in the iron and steel sectors and about 15% of energy in cement manufacture 10. Lu et al. 11 estimate that Taiwan could save 5.3% of national energy usage by applying benchmarks in the six most energy-intensive industries in the country, while Shabbir, Mirzaeian, and Sher 12 estimate that Pakistan could save 43% of energy consumption in the pulp and paper industry by applying benchmarks from the UK and Canada.

Benchmarking programs such as the Superior Energy Performance (SEP) can show financial payback times of less than two years 13.

Problem:
Industrial Energy and Pollution
Solution:
Industrial Energy Benchmarking - World

Rogers, Cooper, and Norman 14, focusing on the paper and pulp industries, caution that benchmarking may be of limited use to individual plants because of differences that particular plants might have, in processes, markets, and other factors, from the industry average.

Motor and Steam Systems

Motor systems use 10,700 TWh of electricity each year, of which 5700 TWh are used by industrial motors 8. Their efficiency will increase by an estimated 14% by 2040 under business as usual, or by 35% under accelerated efficiency policies 5. In 2023, the Energy Efficiency Movement estimated that after seven years, there is a potential for a reduction of 300 million tons of carbon dioxide per year, a bit less than 1% of total world emissions 15. Some of the larger sources of energy savings in motors are the use of variable speed motors 16 and load-based voltage control 17, which adjusts voltage based on load, saving energy particular for motors with low load factors.

Problem:
Energy Lost to Motor Systems
Solution:
Improved Motor Systems

There is an estimated savings potential of 8.8 exajoules per year from steam system energy based on 2005 usage 1. These savings can be realized at a cost of 1.4 to 14.4 ¢/kWh 18. A 2024 case study 19 of a Moroccan pulp and paper mills finds that 6% of energy consumed in steam systems could be saved with measures with short payback periods.

Problem:
Energy Lost to Motor Systems
Solution:
Improved Steam Systems - U.S.

Combined Heat and Power

Conventional thermal power systems waste much heat and operate with an efficiency of about 45%, whereas a combined heat and power (CHP) system generates electricity and captures exhaust heat for direct use. The combined system operates with efficiencies of 65-75% 20, up to 89% 21. We estimate a technical potential of about 75 GW additional CHP capacity in the United States 7, of which about half should be economically viable 4.

Conversely, high temperature waste heat from industrial processes can be recovered for electricity production. The United States has a technical potential of 8,840 MW from waste heat to power (WHP) systems, of which 2,904 MW should be accepted by the market 3.

Problem:
Energy Lost to Waste Heat
Solution:
Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Loan Program

As of 2019, more than 99% of primary energy behind CHP systems were fossil fuels, with more than half of the energy from coal 22. Clean hydrogen 23 is an alternative factored by the CHP industry.

References

  1. GEA, 2012. Global Energy Assessment - Toward a Sustainable Future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria. 2 3

  2. Building Energy Codes Program. "Prototype Building Models High-rise Apartment". Building Technologies Office, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U. S. Department of Energy. April 2011.

  3. Elson, A., Tidball, R., Hampson, A. "Waste Heat to Power Market Assessment". ICF International, prepared for Oak Ridge National Laboratory. March 2015. 2

  4. Hedman, B., Hampson, A., Darrow, K. "The Opportunity for CHP in the United States". ICF International, prepared for the American Gas Association. May 2013. 2

  5. International Energy Agency. "Market Report Series: Energy Efficiency 2018". October 2018. 2

  6. International Energy Agency. "Sankey Diagram". Accessed April 18, 2019.

  7. U.S. Department of Energy. "Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Technical Potential in the United States". March 2016. 2

  8. UN Environment - Global Environment Facility, United for Efficiency (U4E). "Accelerating the Global Adoption of Energy-Efficient Electric Motors and Motor Systems". U4E Policy Guide Series. 2017. 2

  9. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. "Global Industrial Energy Efficiency Benchmarking: An Energy Policy Tool Working Paper". November 2010. 2

  10. International Energy Agency. "Driving Energy Efficiency in Heavy Industries". March 2021.

  11. Lu, S.M., Lu, C., Tseng, K.T., Chen, F., Chen, C.L. "Energy-saving potential of the industrial sector of Taiwan". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 21, pp. 674-683. May 2013.

  12. Shabbir, I., Mirzaeian, M., Sher, F. "Energy efficiency improvement potentials through energy benchmarking in pulp and paper industry". Cleaner Chemical Engineering 3: 100058. September 2022.

  13. Therkelsen, P., Sabouni, R., McKane, A., Scheihing, P. "Assessing the Costs and Benefits of the Superior Energy Performance Program". 2013 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry, Niagara Falls, NY. 2013.

  14. Rogers, J.G., Cooper, S.J., Norman, J.B. "Uses of industrial energy benchmarking with reference to the pulp and paper industries". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 95, pp. 23-37. November 2018.

  15. Energy Efficiency Movement, ABB, International Chamber of Commerce. "The Case for Industrial Energy Efficiency". October 2023.

  16. De Almeida, A., Fong, J., Brunner, C.U., Werle, R., Van Werkhoven, M. "New technology trends and policy needs in energy efficient motor systems-A major opportunity for energy and carbon savings". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 115: 109384. November 2019.

  17. Santos, V.S., Eras, J.J., Ulloa, M.J. "Evaluation of the energy saving potential in electric motors applying a load-based voltage control method". Energy 303: 132012. September 2024.

  18. International Energy Agency. "World Energy Investment Outlook 2014: Energy Efficiency Investment Assumption Tables".

  19. Batouta, K.I., Aouhassi, S., Mansouri, K. "Energy saving potential in steam systems: A techno-economic analysis of a recycling pulp and paper mill industry in Morocco". Scientific African 26: e02375. December 2024.

  20. U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Combined Heat and Power: A Clean Energy Solution". August 2012.

  21. Industrial Efficiency Technology Database. "Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Generation". A project of The Institute for Industrial Productivity. Accessed June 22, 2019.

  22. Patel, S. "A Complex Landscape for the Future of Combined Heat and Power". POWER Magazine. March 2023.

  23. CHP Alliance. "Clean Hydrogen and Combined Heat and Power: A Roadmap for Industrial and Commercial Decarbonization". March 2022.